MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Engineering and Building Record. Vol. XXIII, Feb. 14, 1891, p. 186; Vol. XXIII, April 4,. Worcester Commercial, vo1. 1, np. 4, A8. 1892, p. 144 (Howara C.ock); Vol I, no. 10, Feb. 1893, pp. 372-377 (illustrated article). Worcester Historical Society. Local Industry File. Nutt, C., History of Worcester, Vol. II, pp. 1017-1018.
10 GEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY .4 acre UTM REFERENCES AL1,9 ZONE 12/618/81910 EASTING 1416/812|81810/ BLu LL NORTHING EASTING NORTHING CLL Iilu NORTHING -L LL Led LelILu VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION City Assisors Book *2, page 27, Lot #39 JFT 7/31/78 LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE CODE COUNTY CODE STATE CODE COUNTY CODE FORM PREPARED BY NAME /TITLE Candace Jenkins, National Register Coordinator ORGANIZATION Massachusetts Historical Commission STREET & NUMBER 294 Washington Street CITY OR TOWN Boston Brian Pfeiffer Worcester Heritage Preservation DATE Society July 20, 19/8 TELEPHONE 617-727-8470 STATE Massachusetts 12 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER CERTIFICATION THE EVALUATED SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS PROPERTY WITHIN THE STATE IS: NATIONAL- STATE- LOCALL As the designated State Historic Preservation Officer for the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665).
I hereby nominate this property for inclusion in the National Register and certify that it has been evaluated according to the criteria and procedures set forth by the National Park Service. STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER SIGNATURE vetum Rlalmok. TITLE 7/21/78 DATE FOR NPS USE ONLY Executive Director, Massachusetts Historical Conm. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAI THIS PROPERTY IS INCLUDED IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER R.B. Retti OTREGTOROFRCTOF RSHEOLE ATTEST: LAM. SOUMe DATE -ANO HISTORIC PRESERVATIOALL KEERER OF DATE KEEPER OFTHE NATIONAL REGISTER 7/21/78 9/3/78 ONE MRIKCSESYUNR GPO 892.453 propere Worcester Zine Cents Saving Bank 78000472 Mass. Horking Number7.25.28.3673 Worcester TECHNICAL Photos _ CONTROL Maps - / OK 2.22.28 1,8, lo incomplete. wenk stant of sigmif, but appeans eligible tor anditechme. HISTORIAN 7-31-28 trtorner IGNINLANTAS ONEEG FEWOT IIS TYPE REMAINING.
THE BUILDING AS FARLY AND INNOUATIUE DESLON FALTURES PUDDE AND EPEUSUALL IASTES TO THE NELLHBORING DAY BUKDING. WORK OF PROMNENT LocU ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN CAU HENALLERÍ Us 1/31/28 ARCHEOLOGIST AFTEN 9/24 MBETING ANDREVIRMUG ATTAULED HETTEIS BRUEHK BUILANG ELLIBLK. MEGTINC ONLY RAISED ISSUES AROUT D ECONONAC UABILITY DE RRERAININE DAL, BUILDINL'S ADDITIONS. OTHER HAER Inventory - Review REVIEW UNIT CHIEF margenal statenent Ciccept sigpuficance, o descupliar. Lebovk asklgate a o (sneneus of Peartna (Palenlen) 8/1/18 BRANCH CHIEF arlutesttua. KEEPER Rotting a/13/78 SEP I3 19/8 Entered IN T:21 National Register Write-up Federal Register Entry 11.2>x Send-back Re-submit United States Department of the Interior National Park Service WASO No.
7 JUL 2 5 1978 Five Cents Savings Bank 316 Main Street WORdEStER Worcester, MA dornty Credit: Brian Pfeiffer 1977 Negative: Worcester Heritage Preservation Society Walnut Street elevation #1882 SEP 13 1978 PROPENT DEZIE IEDECZAL REGSTER CONSI COl SUMERS SAVINGS BANK JUL 2 5 1978 Five Cents Savings Bank 1e312 RgeSuaty SEP 1 3 1978 Credit: Brian Pfeiffer #2072 Negative: Worcester Heritage Preservation Society Main and Walnut Street elevations PROPERTY OF THE MATIONIL REGISTER PAUL GUZZI Socmtary of the Commonucalth The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Ofice of the Secretary Massachuselts Historical Commission 291 Washinglon Sired Boston, Massachusells 02108 (617)727-84706) July 21, 1978 RECEIVED JUL 2 5 1978 Mr. Charles Herrington, Chief Registration Branch NATIONAL National Register REGISTER Washington, D.C.
20240 OAHP, Heritage Conservation and Recreation Servick ETTETTT Dear Mr. Herrington: Enclosed you will find the following nomination forms: Worcester - Day Building Worcester - Five Cents Savings Bank The properties have been voted eligible by the State Review Board and have been signed by the State Historic Preservation Officer. We would appreciate an expeditious review of these nominations as they are in inmediate danger of demolition. Sincerely yours, Christie Boulding (() Christine Boulding Acting Survey Director Massachusetts Historical Conmission CB/CJ/1h Encls. -6 316 Main St Worcester 617 754-2653 Worcester Massachusetts 01608 notel 9-15-78 Joe Towner CONSUMERS SAVINGS BANK August 23, 1978 HAND DELI VEREND ESND BY REPS. OF BANK AND DITCUSSED WITH MUNTAGH AND HENRINGIR Dr. William J. Murtagh Keeper of the National Register U. S.
Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation & Recreation Service Washington. D. C. 20240 Dear Dr. Murtagh: In response to the notification dated July 31, 1978, from the Keeper of the National Register that the Day Building and the Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank building in Worcester, Massachusetts, have been nominated to the National Register, the Consumers Savings Bank wishes to comment as follows: Based on the studies and conclusions of consulting architects and engineers, the Bank concurs in'the opinion that the original Day Building Structure D on the attached plan) and the Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank building (Structure E) are of sufficient architectural significance to be included in the National Register.
We do not believe, however, that the subsequent additions to the Day Building (Structures A, B and C) are of the quality of architectural significance as to merit their designation to the National Register. In order to preserve, utilize, and rehabilitate the Day Building (Structure D) and the Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank Building (Structure E), the consulting architects and planners unanimously agree that the later-built structures (Structures A, B and C) must be removed to provide access and parking for the other buildings. This can and will be accomplished with no harm to the other buildings. It is the general opinion of most authorities and consultants that it is vital that the streetscape opposite the rehabilitated Mechanics Hall be preserved, and the Bank concurs in and supports this position.
To this end, the Bank is beginning a program of research and study toward rehabilitation of the facades of the structures facing Main Street. In Offices conveniently located throughout the Greater Worcester Area CONSUMERS SAVINGS BANK August 23, 1978 Dr. William J. Murtagh Page Iwo order to make such an undertaking economically viable and justifiable for the Bank's depositors, it is necessary to remove the later-built structures, in the rear, which do not contribute to the historical significance of the Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank Building and the original Day Building, and to replace them with an area for parking and access to the rehabilitated buildings. The Bank, therefore, supports the designation of the Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank Building and the Day Building as originally constructed to the National Register.
Because of their lack of the necessary quality of architectural significance, the Bank requests that the later-built structures not be named to the Register. of the Board of Trustees indicating their support of this position is attached. Sincerely othe nsillm Ronald W.
Haselton President 316 Main St Worcester 617 754-2653 Worcester Massachusetts 01608 CONSUMERS SAVINGS BANK CERTIFICATE OF VOTE At a Special Meeting in lieu of the regular Trustees' Meeting of the Consumers Savings Bank, held at the Worcester Club, 1 Oak Street, Worcester, Massachusetts, on August 18, 1978, the following was: VOTED:- In order to make feasible the possible preservation and use of the Day Building and the Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank building, to demolish the additions to the Day Building, marked A, B, and C, on the attached plak of existing buildings, so that parking and access to these buildings may be provided, without altering the streetscape fronting Meckanics Hall. ATTEST leso Thomas S. Zocco Clerk Pro Tem Loreo A true copy.
Offices conveniently located throughout the Greater Worcester Area WORCESTER HERITAGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY 321 MAIN STREET - WORCESTER -MASSACHUSETTS August 23, 1978 01608 HAND DELLUEREO AND DISCUSSED BY REPS. FRM BINK AND MURTAGA AND HERRINGTON. Dr. William J. Murtagh Keeper of the National Register National Park Service Washington, D.C. 20013 Dear Dr. Murtagh: The old Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank (316 Main Street) and the Day Building complex next door (300 - 310 Main Street) in Worcester, Massachu- setts were recently voted eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places by the Massachusetts Historical Commission.
This nomination was the result of a comprehensive survey of Worcester buildings conducted by an independent architectural historian retained by the Worcester Heritage Pres- ervation Society and reviewed by the staff of the Massachusetts Historical Com- - mission. We have been working with Consumers Savings Bank (the owners of the buildings) since last spring in an pffort to find an economically feasible way to rehabilitate and save these structures. We are delighted that the Consumers Savings Bank after careful considera- tion has decided to preserve and rehabilitate the Main Street buildings. The Bank and its consulting architects and engineers have concluded that the buildings at the rear, which are designated A, B & C must be demolished in order to provide necessary access and parking for the Main Street buildings, which are designated D, E & F.
While we feel that the Register nomination was correct in including Buildings D, E & F, we believe that the preservation and rehabilitation of the Main Street buildings (D, E & F) are so important to the Main Street streetscape and are of such significance historically and architecturally that they simply must take precedence over buildings A, B & C. This is all the more important because Mechanics Hall, now almost completely restored, is directly across the street from buildings D, E & F. We congratulate the Trustees and officers of Consumers Bank for their willingness to explore the possibilities and their commitment to the preserva- tion and rehabilitation of their historic Main Street buildings. May the results be as affirmative and as successful as the restoration of Mechanics Hall. Cordially, Rickard WQeasbors Richard W.
Dearborn President ENTRIES IN THE NATIONAL, FZGISTER MASSACHUSETTS STATE Date Entered -SEP 13 1013 Name Fenway Studios Bullding Longwood Histor/c District Worcester Five Cents Saving Bank Day Building Location Boston Suffolk County Brookline No riolk County Worcester Worcester County Worcester Worcester Courty Also Notified Honorable Edward W. Brooke Honorable Edward M. Kennedy Honorable John J. Moakley Honorable Joseph D. Early Honorable Robert P. Drinan Sates Historie Preservation Officer Mrs. Fatricia I. Weslowsk1 Executive Director Massachusetts Historical Comission 294 Washington Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 NR Byers/bjr 9/18/78 F78(730) MAY 7 1982 Mr. Thomas Ruchala Consumers Savings Bank 316 Main Street Worcester, Massachusetts 01608 Dear Mr.
Ruchala: Re: Day Building (300-310 Main Street, 2-6 Walnut Street, 8-10 Walnut Street) Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank (316 Main Street), Worcester, Massachusetts Project number: MA-82-0231 I have concluded the review of your appeal in which you requested that I overrule the finding of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Director that the work undertaken on the Day Building and the Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank cannot be a "certified rehabilitation" for purposes of section 212 ,of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. The basis for denial of certification was that the project did not meet the Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for Rehabilitation" due to the Pfoposed demolition of the two later additions of the Day Building (2-6 Walnut Street, 8-10 Walnut Street).
The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 established significant tax incentives for the rehabilitation of certified historic structures provided that the rehabilitation is generally consistent with the historic character of the building and/or district in which it is located. The Act states that only those buildings subject to depreciation that have been substantially rehabilitated and that retain 75 percent or more of the existing exterior walls in the rehabilitation process may qualify for the preservation tax incentives.
With these statutory requirements in mind, and after careful considera- tion of the information presented in your appeal, I have determined that the work to be performed on the Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank meets the Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for Rehabilitation" and may be considered a "certified rehabilitation" upon completion of the project if the work is carried out as specified in your application. Regarding the Day Building, I have determined that the finding of the Regional Director was correct in that the proposed demolition of the two later additions does not meet the Standards, and that the proposed work for this particular structure may not be certified for purposes of the tax incentives. The reasons for my decision on the Day Building are discussed below.
The Regionel Director stated in his denial letter of February 18, 1982, that he considered the two later additions te be of historical and architectural significance. This finding was strongly reiterated by the Acting Keeper of the National Register of Historie Places after carefully revieving the nomination in the context of the appeal and your rehabilitation proposal. Even though the original portion of the Day Building will be preserved in your rehabilitation proposal, I agree with the determination that the substantial desolition work would not constitute adequate preservation of this National Register resource. Purthermore, I have considerable concern that the rehabilitation would not meet another statutory requirement of the law since 75 percent of the existing exterior walls will not be retained following rehabili- tation.
This determination, hovever, is one made by the Internal Revenue Service and not the National Park Service. Let me assure you that the economic necessity for demolishing the two later additions in order to construct parking facilities was thoroughly considered in my review of your appeal. In the final snalysis, however, the retention of the original structure and demolitien ol the two later additions would not preserve the historic charaçter of the atructure or the district in which it is located. It ia for this reason that I Day Building. Cents Savings Bank and the Aey Building as two separate projects, I have determined that the proposed rehabilitation of the forner meets the Secretary's Standards while the rehabili- tation of the latter fails to meet the regulatory and statutery requirements for the law.
As Department of Interior regula- tions (36 CFR Part 67) state, this decisios shall be the final decision regarding denial of certification for this particular rehabilitation project. Sincerely, wee H. Nelson Lee H. Nelson, AIA Chief, Technical Preservation Services Division cc: Mrs. Patricia L. Weslowski, SHPO Congressman Early bcc: MARO attn: Myra Harrison SOL E1a 730-BASIC FILE RETAINED IN 730 FNP:CSOWICK:m8 :5/6/82:272-3721 Editorials Worcester Sunday Telegram July 9, 1978 RECEIVED JUL 2 5 1978 NATIONALI REGISTER On Preserving Historic Buildings The United States government organizations like the Worcester and American society in general are aoing a U-turn in respect to preserv- Heritage Preservation Society were formed. They have done the difficult ing historic places.
legwork, they have collected the As a result, some owners of com- data,they have sponsored the sur- mercial properties are in a dilemma. veysnecessary. Worcester owes a They find theirfreedomof action re- debt to the WHPS that will only be stricted by what they see as a change fully appreciated years from now. in the rules. Neither the Heritage Society nor A good example is Consumer's Consumer's Bank wants any kind of Savings Bank, which bought the Day confrontation or bad feeling over the Building next to its own building last Day Building and the bank building. year. Although Consumers has never The bank spelled out what it planned to do people endorse the principle of historic preservation.
with the property, it plainly expected The society's staff to have the option of tearing down understands the dilemma that the bank is in, and the Day Building, and possibly its is trying to make suggestions to re- own building next door also. solve it. Today that option is not as clear- The society is convinced that the cut as it was. The Day Building has old buildings can be been included among about 100 Wor- economically rehabilitated and used by the bank, cester buildings especially worthy of either as owner or as prime tenant, , preservation. The Massachusetts much as was done at Harrington Historical Commission will soon de- Corner by Worcester County Institu- cide whether to recommend having it tion for Savings. - listed in the National Register of His- The bank's own studies so far do toric Places. not agree with that conclusion.
Park- Once it is listed, the owners will ing is a big problem. If some way can no longer be able to take advantage be found to provide the bank with 50 of accelerated depreciation costs and or so parking spaces, a solution may demolition costs in regard to federal taxes if they decide to raze it. From the point of view of the peo- Consumer's Bank officials estimate ple of Worcester, there is no doubt in that listing willcost them at least our mind that the demolition of ei- $65,000 and probably much more if ther the Day Building or the bank they tear down. buicling would be tragic. They stand Instead, they will be eligible for right across the street from Mechan- substantial tax deductions only if ics Hall and are an integral part of a they decide to keep and rehabilitate complex of attractive old office build- the two buildings. ings that dominate that part of Main For many years. U.S.
tax laws en- Street on both sides. They all solidly couraged the demolition of old build- reflect the Worcester of an earlier ings and the construction of new day, even as Mechanics Hall repre- ones in central cities. The idea was to sents an even older era. They give an keep the cehtral cities from blight air of permanence and recognition. and decay. The loss of any of them would be a The policy was only partly suc- loss not wholly calculable in dollars cessful. Now the emphasis is on preserva- tion of historic or distinguished buildings. Anyone who-has seen what has happened to Worcester in the past generation can appreciate why. Although some demolition of. slums was necessary for complexes like Worcester Center, too much un- controlled destruction and change can tear the heart out of a downtown and destroy some of its charm and. spirit.
It was to prevent chaos and to block the bulldozer mentality that. So, along with thousands of oth- ers here in Worcester, we hope that an accommodation can be made be- tween the needs of the bank and the needs of the community at large. The historic integrity of that most interesting part of Worcester's cen- tral business district should be pre- served if at all possible. We com- mend the Heritage Preservation So- ciety for its convictions, just as we commend the bank for its willing- ness to consider the publie interest. 1i11 CORE roaal 10 4110 NATIONAL REGISTER DATA SHEET ONAME as it appears on federal register: OTHER NAMES: 3 date of entry: county code: Worcester Five Cents Savings Bank Consumers Savings Bank SEP 13 1978 27 5 LOCATIO street & number city / town vicinity of GNPS REGION: 316 Main St.
Worcester NA OWNER XPRIVATE OSTATE OMUNICIPAL COUNTY MULTIPLE OFEDERAL (agency name) EXISTING SURVEYS CHABS CHAER ONHI O FUNDED? DYES ONO (11)CONGRESS. DISTRICT 3rd state county MA 12)SOURCE of NOMINATION Worcester X STATE )ADMINISTRATOR: -FEDERAL HISTORTE LANDHARK Candace Who form?
Jenkins 0.4 ULOCAL ORGANIZATION )CONDITION Dexcellent -good Ofair - deteriorated Oruins Qunexposed Ounexcavated Oaltered Ounaltered Oreconstructed -excavated (BACCESS OYES-Restricted -YES -Unrestricted AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE : -ARCHEOLOGY- prehistoric-2 -COMMERCE-6 -ARCHEOLOGY-historic-1 - COMMUNICATIONS - 7 - AGRICULTURE -3 - CONSERVATION - 8 - ARCHITECTURE-4 - ECONOMICS-9 -ART-5 - EDUCATION-10 CENGINEERING-11 DENTERTAINMENT-26 -EXPLORATION -12 - HEALTH-27 - INDUSTRY- 13 - INVENTION -14 Doriginal site Omoved Dunknown 17 features: OSUBSTANTIALLY INTACT-1 @OSUBSTANTIALLY INTACT -2 SONOT INTACT-O OSUBSTANTIALLY INTACT -3 OO NOT INTACT-O WOUNKNOWN-4 EONOT INTACT - O 5OUNKNOWN-6 2O NOT APPLICABLE -7 JONOT APPLICABLE-8 ZO NOT APPLICABLE - 9 - No Access - Unknown SADAPTIVE USE DYES ONO SAVED? -YES PROPERTY A HISTORIC DISTRICT?
Dyes Ono -LANDSCAPE ARCH.- 15 - LAW-16 - LITERATURE-17 - MILITARY- 18 - MUSIC - 19 - PHILOSOPHY - 20 - POLITICS/ GOVT.- 21 -RECREATION -28 @CLAIMS: explain 'first'O MRELIGION-22 CSETTLEMENT-29 - SCIENCE- 23 -URBAN PLANWING-31 'oldest' O - SOCIAL/HUMANITARIAN-24 D OTHER (SPECIFY) - SOCIAL / CULTURAL-30 - TRANSPORTATION -25 'only' D funetions WHEN HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT: CURRENTLY: architectural style(s): dates of initial construction: major alterations : historic events: ETHNIC GROUP ASSOCIATION architect: master builder: engineer: Dlandscape architect/ garden designer: interior decorator: artist: artisan: @builder/contractor: NAMES give role & date PERSONAL: EVENTS : INSTITUTIONAL: NATIONAL REGISTER WRITE-UP Ireviewers initials. date |IF ADDITIONAL SPACE NEEDED, NUMBER & PUT ON REVERSE