New Jerusalem, Ohio

The same ground, surveyed 86 years apart. Drag the handle to wipe between them. Both sheets are United States Geological Survey originals; neither has been altered.

1900 1986

Matched by testing this settlement's coordinate against the published boundary of every sheet in the United States Geological Survey's historical collection. Each opens the scanned sheet at the Survey.

• 1900 USGS Maumee Bay quadrangle1:62500
• 1900 USGS Maumee Bay quadrangle1:62500
• 1934 USGS Reno Beach quadrangle1:24000
• 1938 USGS Reno Beach quadrangle1:31680
• 1938 USGS Reno Beach quadrangle1:31680
• 1952 USGS Reno Beach quadrangle1:24000
• 1956 USGS Toledo quadrangle1:250000
• 1956 USGS Toledo quadrangle1:250000
• 1956 USGS Toledo quadrangle1:250000
• 1956 USGS Toledo quadrangle1:250000
• 1961 USGS Toledo quadrangle1:250000
• 1967 USGS Reno Beach quadrangle1:24000
• 1986 USGS Toledo quadrangle1:100000
• 1986 USGS Toledo quadrangle1:100000

The federal wildfire occurrence database lists 13 fires within 5 miles of New Jerusalem (historical) between 2013 and 2020, burning about 4 acres in total. None started naturally. 1 was recorded as arson. Distance is straight-line from the map coordinates, so a fire counted here may appear on a neighbouring settlement's page as well.

The most recent of them, most recent first, with the day each was reported and the service that recorded it.

Settlements close enough to share some of these fires:

• Yondota
• Bono
• Lakemont Landing
• Reno Beach
• Curtice
• Lakeland

Every fire recorded in Lucas County

Museums hold 623 specimens collected within 10 miles of New Jerusalem (historical) between 1892 and 1975: 599 Animalia, 15 Plantae, 5 Protozoa, 4 Fungi. 12 distinct Species records are shown. Collected by AS Hazzard & party, Al Szuch, Anson A. Hinkley and others. Each is a physical object with a catalogue number, and each entry opens the museum's record. This is what was collected and kept, not a survey of what lives here - nothing can be concluded from a species being absent.

Image	Species	Year	Collected by	Where, as recorded
	Moxostoma macrolepidotum (Lesueur, 1817)	1892	C. Rutter	Cedar Point, Toledo, Ohio
	Percina caprodes (Rafinesque, 1818)	1892	C. Rutter	Cedar Point, Toledo, Ohio
	Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque, 1820)	1894	C. Rutter	Ohio, Cedar Point, Toledo
	Ameiurus nebulosus (Lesueur, 1819)	1894	C. Rutter	Ohio, Cedar Point, Toledo
	Cambarus diogenes Girard, 1852	1894	C. Rutter	Toledo, Presque Isle
	Esox Linnaeus, 1758	1894	C. Rutter	Ohio, Toledo, Presque Isle
	Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758	1894	C. Rutter	Ohio, Toledo, Presque Isle
	Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818)	1894	C. Rutter	Ohio, Cedar Point, Toledo
	Lepisosteus osseus (Linnaeus, 1758)	1894	C. Rutter	Ohio, Toledo, Presque Isle
	Lithobates pipiens (Schreber, 1782)	1894	not recorded	Toledo, Cedar Point
	Micropterus Lacepède, 1802	1894	C. Rutter	Ohio, Toledo, Presque Isle
	Notropis heterolepis Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1893	1894	C. Rutter	Ohio, Cedar Point, Toledo

All 623 specimens within 10 miles, at the Global Biodiversity Information Facility.

The eight closest, with where each one stands in the county. Distances are straight-line, computed from the Geographic Names Information System coordinates.

This settlement is recorded in the Geographic Names Information System as feature 1070565. The sheet list is computed by point-in-boundary test against the United States Geological Survey's historical topographic inventory. Both are works of the United States government and carry no copyright under 17 U.S.C. 105.

Wildfire. Short, Karen C. 2022. Spatial wildfire occurrence data for the United States, 1992-2020 [FPA_FOD_20221014]. 6th Edition. Fort Collins, CO: Forest Service Research Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2013-0009.6 Collected with United States Government funding and usable without additional permissions or fees.

Specimens. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), https://www.gbif.org/. Only records licensed CC0 or CC BY are used. Records licensed CC BY-NC are excluded because this site carries advertising. Images are checked individually and any whose licence is non-commercial, no-derivatives or unreadable is refused.