Beatty, Early Papermaking in Utah. Carter;, Kate B. , Heart Throbs of the West, Daughters of the Utah Pioneers, Vol. 11, Deseret News, August 20, i960. Deseret News, September 26, Salt Lake City Illustrated, S. W. Darke Co., Salt Lake City, Includes a drawing of the Granite Paper Mill. Salt Lake Tribune, July 2k, Prepared by John L. Giusti, AIA September 5, PART II. ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION A. General Statement: 1. Architectural interest: The Granite Paper Mill typifies early Utah industrial architecture. 2. Condition of fabric: The Granite Paper Mill burned in and only the granite walls remain intact. In the north wing was renovated as a recreation building. Both the original walls and the modern renovation are in good condition.
The south wing remains gutted and serves as an outdoor dance area. B. Description of Exterior: 1. Overall dimensions: An east-west x 66' rectangle of three stories intersects with a north-south x 56' rec rectangle to form an L. There is an 11' x 11' tower at the intersection. 2. Foundations: Coursed gray granite ashlar,- 3. Wall construction, finish, and color: Grey coursed granite ashlar, set with mortar of clay and stone grindings. k. Structural system, framing: Masonry walls support timber framing. The present wood frame was added in the original having burned in 5. Porches: None remain. GRANITE PAPER MILL HABS Mo. U-'Sa. (Page k) 6. Chimneys: The heavy brick chimney on east side is UTt\<i modern. > . ^\i c t 7. Openings: "< a. Doorways and doors: There are three types of doorways.
Openings intended for double doors are arched, either round or segmental. There is a seg- mental arch over a single door opening in the south wing; otherwise single openings have heavy timber or granite lintels. b. Windows and shutters: With the exception of a segmental arch over a third floor north window, all window open- ings in the north wing have granite lintels and those in the ruined south wing have heavy timber lintels. 8. Roof: a. Shape, covering: Present gabled roof replaces the similar original roof. b. Cornice9 waves: None remain from the original structure. c. Dormers, cupolas, towers: A modern hipped roof replaces the original mansard roof of the hundred foot tower. C. Description of Interior: 1. Floor plans: Original plans are not available.
Presently the south wing, open to the is used as an outdoor dance floor. The north wing has restrooms, furnace room, and entry space on the first floor; a two-and-a-half story dance hall, a bar, offices and restrooms at the second level, an apartment at the second floor mezzanine, and party rooms and an indoor archery range on the third floor. 2. Stairways: The modern stairway is located on the south side of the north wing. 3. Flooring: Was wood, burned in k. Wall and ceiling finish: Walls are and presumably were exposed gray granite ashlar. 5. Doorways and doors: The original doorways are topped either by keyed arches or by heavy timber lintels. No original doors remain. 6. Lighting, type of fixtures: Modern electric fixtures are now used. 7.
Heating: Furnace was installed in The original heating is not known. The fireplace in the north wing is modern. GRANITE PAPER MILL HABS Ho. U-^ft (Page 5) UTAH D. Site and Surroundings: 3. The front of the "building faces Big Cottonwood Canyon road to the west and the building is near the west boundary of the site. Entry is beneath the tower on this side. Big Cotton- wood Creek runs on the west of the site, contributing to the rural character of the area. Prepared by C. W. Barrow, Jr. September 6, PART III. PROJECT INFORMATION This record is part of a Utah Survey conducted in the summers of I967 and under joint sponsorship of the Historic American Buildings Survey of the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation of the National Park Service and the Utah Heritage Foundation.
Field work, historic research and record drawings were done under the direction of Project Supervisor Paul Goeldner, AIA (Texas Tech Univer- sity), assisted by Project Historian John Giusti, AIA (University of Utah). Photographs were made by P. Kent Fairbanks of Salt Lake City. Student Assistant Architects on the team were Robert M. Swanson and Charles W. Barrow, (University of Texas) and Kenneth L. Lambert and Keith Sorenson, (University of Utah), Student Assistant Architects were Keith Sorenson, Charles D. Barker and Robert Schriever, (University of Utah) and Donald G. Prycer, (Texas A. & M. University).