Rebecca Jacobsen, HABS, summer PART I. HISTORICAL INFORMATION I. Physical History: 1. Date of Erection: The Clark dome was erected on the Lowell Observatory site sometime in as a replacement for a temporary dome put up in The exact date of the Clark dome's completion is unclear, although letters and telegrams from Percival Lowel1 to Andrew E. Douglass, an astronomer hired by Lowell to select the Observatory site, place the date between September and December of that year.1 2. Architect: Godfrey Sykes designed the Clark dome under the direction of astronomers A. E. Douglass and William Pickering.
Godfrey Sykes was originally from England, and located in Flagstaff in He and his brother Stanley opened a machine shop and were known locally as "Makers and Menders of Anything."3 Both men assisted in observatory building construction and instrument making. Stanley Sykes would remain an observatory employee for forty six years.4 3. Original and Subsequent Owners: The dome has been part of the Lowell Observatory since it was built in The building and the observatory as a whole were owned by Percival Lowell until his death in Lowell had set aside funding for the continuing operation of the observatory and it is now # operated under the "Percival Lowell Estate." LOWELL OBSERVATORY, CLARK DOME HABS NO. A2-206-B (page 2) 4.
Building Contractors/Suppliers: The designer and builder of the Clark telescope dome was Godfrey Sykes, a 5native of England and Flagstaff res ident since the He was assisted in construction by Edgar Whipple, one of Flagstaff's first settlers.6 Lumber for framing the dome was supplied locally, probably by the Arizona Lumber and Timber Company. Dennis Riordan, Lumber Company proprietor, had offered A. E. Douglass lodging during Douglass's site search. "Furniture" inside the dome, including ladders and platforms, was constructed by Godfrey Sykes and Edgar Whipple. The lens for the dome's telescope, a 24-inch refractor, came7 from Alvan Clark and Sons of Cambridgeport, Massachusetts.
A Brashear spectrograph was purchased in and installed in The driving clock for the telescope was built by Stanley Sykes, Godfrey's brother. Stanley Sykes would be an Observatory employee for almost fifty years. Stanley was also responsible for the construction of a short-lived pontoon system for rotating the dome in a water-filled track. In the iron wheels on which the dome rotated were worn % out. V. M. SIipher, Lowell astronomer and former Director, provided the money to purchase a set of rubber Ford automobile tires to replace the iron wheels.10 5. Original plans and construction: What appears to be an early set of blueprints in the Lowell Observatory archives, although undated, suggests that the structure has not changed much since it was built.
The blueprints show one large circular room, open to the ceiling, with a fan-like rafter pattern inside the dome. This arrangement exists today. Early photographs (pre-1900) show the building to have a wooden cylindrical base topped with a dome shaped like an "inverted bucket." Both base and dome were painted white. The entrance was a single, wood paneled door facing northeast, with a simple, unpainted set of wooden stairs. 6. The Clark dome has had no major additions. It has, however, had a number of small alterations: Pre-1900 photographs show a number of small changes in the exterior fabric of the dome, most of them likely made by Stanley and Godfrey Sykes.
Although none of the photographs are specifically dated, the alterations they depict would have been made shortly after the dome was re- erected on the site in (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). The original canvas dome covering, for example, would have been replaced # with a metal covering almost immediately in order to protect LOWELL OBSERVATORY, CLARK DOME HABS NO. AZ-206-B (page 3) the new 24-inch refracting telescope. Further evidence dating these photographs to pre-1900 is the appearance of the small workman's cottage in the background. This structure was constructed in and was added on to first in then again in subsequent11 years, to serve as Percival Lowell's private residence. The structure appears in the photographs without these additions.
The early alterations to the Clark dome, in estimated chronological order, include: Canvas dome covering replaced with thin sheet metal. Top canvas observatory door replaced with a metal faced wood door. Bottom canvas observatory door replaced with a metal faced wood door. Wood vertical slat foundation covered with shingles. Stanley Sykes experimented with a method for rotating the dome on wood pontoons in a water filled track. Notes in Lowell archives entitled ,fA Diary of Floating the Dome" describe the progress of the project. Work began in February % and an entry dated May 10 noted, "Leaks all stopped (or nearly). Pontoons in and at enough water in trench to float dome. Turned once around." The pontoon system worked, but caused problems in winter when the water in the trench froze.
The system was quickly removed (date unknown) and traditional metal wheels were put back in place.12 Wood building foundations were redone in concrete. These footings were repaired in The foundations are currently faced with 13malpais volcanic rock and match other observatory buildings. The old metal wheels for rotating the dome were replaced with new, rubber tires. These tires, in place in the dome today, were from the Ford Motor company and came complete with hubcaps. The tires were purchased with funds donated by Vesto Melvin Slipher, Lowell astronomer and observatory Director after Percival Lowell's death.14 Some minor alterations have been made to better accommodate visitors to the Clark dome. Most of these alterations have been done by Lowell maintenance man Gerald McGlothlin.
These alterations include: Glass panes added to the north east door of the dome, date unknown. Removal of a small, curvilinear portico from the north east # entrance door in and re-installing it over the south LOWELL OBSERVATORY, CLARK DOME HABS NO. AZ-206-B (page 4) door in Construction of a wood, end gabled portico with two wood columns over the north east door in Construction of a concrete ramp with tubular metal rails around the eastside of the dome, from the north east door to the south door in B. Historical Context: The construction of a telescope dome on Mars Hill in marked the beginning of many years of astronomical study at Lowell Observatory. The Observatory, founded by wealthy Bostonian Percival Lowell, was unique among nineteenth century observatories in a number of ways.
Its mountain top location as opposed to traditional placement near a university, for example, reflected a growing knowledge of the effects of atmosphere on observing.16 Lowell's pattern of housing telescopes in individual buildings instead of all under one large roof was likely a product of the initial temporary status of the Observatory as well as the difficulty of getting building materials to the top of a mountain in frontier Arizona, yet it was a precursor to the layout of observatories % in the twentieth century.17 Even Lowell's emphasis on the study of the solar system was unusual among contemporary observatories as most other observatories all over the world devoted themselves to studying the stars.
Perhaps the most visual difference between Lowell and other late nineteenth century observatories was the shape of Lowell's domes. Rather than the traditional hemispherical shape, some of 18the domes at Lowell were built in an "inverted bucket" shape. The first dome to be built in this shape was the 24-inch Clark telescope dome. The 24-inch Clark Dome The dome of the 24-inch Clark refracting telescope is the oldest existing telescope dome at the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona. Built of local materials by local contractors, the Clark dome's unique "inverted bucket" shape made it quite unlike contemporary domes such as the Lick Observatory dome on Mt.
Hamilton, California, or the Yerkes Observatory dome in Williams Bay, Wisconsin, each of which have a hemispherical dome.19 The odd shape of the dome may be attributed to its designer, Godfrey Sykes. Sykes, a native of England and Flagstaff resident since was an expert with all things mechanical. He and his brother Stanley operated a shop in Flagstaff, and # were known locally as "Makers and Menders of Anything.11*3 LOWELL OBSERVATORY, CLARK DOME HABS NO. AZ-206-B (page 5) In Sykes was approached by Percival Lowell to design a new 40' telescope dome for the Observatory to replace a smaller, temporary dome that had been built on the site in Sykes agreed to the project but was a bit hesitant since he had never designed such a structure before.
In his memoirs, Sykes described his dilemma: I asked him [Lowell] for more explicit instructions as to the details because, as I explained, the building of astronomical domes had not hitherto been one of my more common forms of activity. He replied that as we claimed to be competent makers of anything, that of course covered the case and settled the matter. He deemed it to have been a concession upon his part to have mentioned the diameter of the structure which he wished for and further discussion concerning details was clearly unneces sary.22 Sykes was not entirely unfamiliar with domes as he had been asked to help correct dome rotation problems with the early, temporary dome. He turned to Andrew E.
Douglass, Harvard astronomy professor and Lowell's "chief of operations" at the Flagstaff site, for instruction on dome rotation. In a January letter to Percival Lowell, Douglass wrote, "Have finished an article on 'The Dome Telescope,' a combination of a spherical dome and telescope . . . But I can't get enough books of reference to settle some of the questions raised by Sykes, chief among which is the power required to set in motion a spherical shell weighing 300 to 400 tons . . . "23 In the end, the new design was Sykes's own. As he described it in his memoirs, "It was to be constructed of timber, framed as lightly as possible in order not to retain an undue amount of heat after sunset ... so what finally emerged from my brainstorms . . .
was a structure like a 24huge inverted bucked, surmounted by a flattish conical lid." With the help of Flagstaff resident Edgar Whipple, Sykes was able to put the Clark dome together in the last several months of There was considerable pressure to erect the dome quickly as Lowell needed the dome to house the new 24-inch refracting telescope he ordered from the famous instrument makers Alvan Clark and Sons of Cambridgeport, Massachusetts. The telescope was due to be completed June 1, and Lowell intended to use both telescope and dome to make observations of Mars during the upcoming "favorable opposition."26 Yellow pine was used to frame the dome as it was locally available and could be gotten quickly.
According to Sykes, the bucket shape of the dome was a concession to the poor quality of the framing materials. Sykes did not feel that pine could not support a traditional hemispherical dome.27 LOWELL OBSERVATORY, CLARK DOME HABS NO. AZ-206-B (page 6) Interestingly, the Clark dome was being constructed at a time when Percival Lowell was having second thoughts about keeping the Observatory in Flagstaff. In the year Lowell sent Douglass to the southwest to search for suitable sites, Flagstaff had provided the best "seeing" in Arizona. William Pickering, a Harvard colleague of A. E. Douglass, designed a temporary, portable dome and had it shipped to the Flagstaff site.28 Douglass, Pickering, and Lowell began making observations that summer with the temporary dome and two borrowed telescopes.
However, during the next two years, the seeing quality was much poorer, and the winter of was so cloudy and snowy that Douglass, the only member of the group to remain in Flagstaff in the winter, was only able to observe the sky for a few days.29 On March 5, Lowell wrote to Douglass from Boston regarding the future of the Observatory. He wrote, "The seeing seems to be so perpetually poor now that I see little use in keeping up the observatory longer. . . My plan at present is to find another site for the opposition30and to ship the dome as it is to wherever that may be. . .
." Douglass ceased making observations in Flagstaff on April 3, Lowell suggested Mexico City as a possible alternative site, and shortly after, Douglass traveled south to test the "seeing" at various points in Mexico.32 The alternative observatory site finally selected was 33 Tacubaya, Mexico, and the move took pi ace in November 18 9 6. Sykes and Whipple, aware of the intended move, constructed the new dome so it could be taken apart and easily shipped to its new location.34 In December Douglass and Sykes, with the help of local laborers, were hard at work re-constructing the dome at the nex site in Mexico.
By the end of the month, Percival Lowell himself arrived in Tacubaya with the new Clark telescope.35 During the winter of the dome and telescope were used in making observations of Mars, studying the atmosphere and its effects on observing, and studying the planets of Mercury and Venus.36 While the observing in Mexico was satisfactory, Lowell decided to move back to the Flagstaff site in the spring. Lowell apparently felt that the quality of observing was no better in Mexico than it had been in the Arizona Territory, and further, the political climate was much more stable in the United States. By April the dome was back in Flagstaff being assembled again on the mesa west of town. The telescope arrived the first week 37in May, at which time permanent, regular observations began.
LOWELL OBSERVATORY, CLARK DOME HABS NO. AZ-206-B (page 7) Making Observations Unfortunately, Lowell was personally unable to resume his observations of Mars as he suffered from 38a bout of "nervous exhaustion" upon his return from Mexico. This condition kept him from his work for the next four years. Lowell's illness was particularly poorly timed, as members of the astronomy community had begun to react to Lowell's publishings on his Mars research.39 Lowell had been interested in Mars since the when Italian astronomer Giovani V. Schiaparelli announced his discovery of canali on the surface of the planet.
Canali, which should have been translated as "channels" was erroneously interpreted as "canals," and very quickly the mis-interpretation grew even larger as some assumed that intelligent life was necessary to create such canals. Lowell was one who strongly believed in life on Mars and much of his research was carried out to prove that life (though not necessarily human life) existed on that planet.40 In fact, Lowell founded his observatory with the intent to study Mars in detail.41 The observations Lowell made during the summer of the % first summer of observing in Flagstaff, led to a series of lectures and a number of publications touting his belief in life on Mars.
His theories and writings were questioned by a number of prominent astronomers, notably Lick Observatory astronomers Edward S. Holden and W. W. Campbell, and a public debate ensued. Lowell was accused of making extreme claims without having compiled enough research to back up his revelations. Others suggested that since Lowell was the only one to see the things he claimed to have seen, perhaps his telescope lens was faulty. In any case, Lowell's "nervous exhaustion" kept him from making new observations, the very thing he needed to find further proof to substantiate his claims.42 Mars was not the only ob j ect of study at the Lowell Observatory. Lowell and his staff also turned the telescope towards Venus, and again, Lowell's "discoveries" caused a great deal of argument.
Venus has always been difficult for astronomers to study due to the planet's heavy cloud cover. Surface features remained indistinct even when viewed through the best telescopes under ideal conditions. Lowell, however, claimed to see some interesting detail. This detail allowed him to calculate the rotation period of the planet. Once again, Lowell's calculations were in conflict with those of other astronomers and the result was yet further controversy.43 As with the Mars debates, Lowell's health kept him from doing the research necessary to support his # theories. LOWELL OBSERVATORY, CLARK DOME HABS NO.
AZ-206-B (page 8) Interestingly, it was the debate over the rotation of Venus that brought on the next phase of Lowell Observatory research and prompted an important addition to the Clark dome. Lowell needed a second method to calculate the rotation of Venus to back up his earlier findings. Realizing that "spectrography"44 could be helpful in making such calculations, Lowell arranged to have instrument-maker John A. Brashear make a spectrograph for the Lowell Observatory.45 The instrument, which would be mounted with the 24-inch Clark telescope, arrived at roughly the same time as a new assistant at the Observatory: Vesto Melvin Slipher.46 In time, Slipher would become an expert with the spectrograph.
He used it not only to conduct planetary research for Lowell, but in his own studies of stars and spiral nebulae. Slipher's work with spectrography led to one of the most important discoveries in astronomy. By studying the spectral lines produced by the Andromeda and Virgo nebulae, Slipher determined that the nebulae were moving away from the Earth. This discovery would lead to the current theory that the universe is expanding.47 "A Diary of Floating the Dome" % While observations went on inside the Clark dome, a few changes were being made to the exterior. As the dome moved from temporary status to permanent status, the exterior fabric changed. A number of photographs taken by A. E. Douglass document these changes.
Between and the original canvas covering on the dome was replaced by thin sheet metal. Next, wood and metal observation doors were built first on top of the dome, then on the side. In addition, shingles were placed around the wood foundations.48 Perhaps the most radical change in the Clark dome was made in In that year, Stanley Sykes, brother of dome designer Godfrey Sykes, tackled the significant problem of making the heavy Clark dome rotate smoothly. A. E. Douglass and Godfrey Sykes had run into problems making the first dome, the 18-inch temporary telescope dome, rotate. In fact, when the temporary dome was first put together, the wheels were not aligned properly and the dome would not rotate at all. It then49had to be completely taken apart and half the wheels re-set.
In when Douglass and Godfrey Sykes first discussed dome rotation, an interesting solution was touched upon. Douglass mentioned this solution to Lowell in a January50 letter. He suggested that the dome would "float in water." The "floating dome" idea was not original to Godfrey Sykes. In the Gustave Eiffel, the famous French engineer, # proposed a similar system for the Bischoffsheim observatory in LOWELL OBSERVATORY, CLARK DOME HABS NO. A2-206-B (page 9) Nice, France. Cannonballs had been previously used to rotate the domes, but this method required perfectly level ground or the dome would not rotate easily.
According to Marian Donnelly in the book A Short History of Observatories, Eiffel "suggested that the dome have a box at the bottom which would float in a tank of corresponding shape and filled with water or some other fluid. . . . The fluid chosen was a solution of chloride of magnesium, which would not 51be expected to freeze at temperatures above -40 degrees C. " It is 1 ikely that Andrew Douglass gave Godfrey Sykes reading material on the sub j ect.52 In Stanley Sykes set about to try this method. He began working on a way to "float the dome" using wooden pontoons in a water-filled track. Originally, the dome moved via a set of small, iron wheels on a hardwood track.
Sykes's plan called for the removal of the wheels and the construction of a tin- lined trench in place of the hardwood track. The trench would be filled with water and a number of hollow, wood pontoons with the dome resting on top were to be floated in the trench. Sykes's notes on the project also called for some sort of tank and trough, presumably for maintaining the water supply in the trench." Sykes's notes from June entitled "A Diary of Floating the Dome" chronicle the construction process. According to the notes, work began in February The pontoons themselves were constructed first, with lumber arriving on the or of the month. By the middle of March, Sykes was busy removing parts of the "gallery," an narrow interior catwalk, and putting in the bottom of the trough.
The original track was removed and by March 31, Sykes and assistant Harry Hussey began to line water holding parts with tin.54 On April 22, Sykes noted that the "Tank [was] built and door to trench built. Tin also put inside trench He further stated that "Water for testing trench comes up [to] 500 gal." The final entry of the "Diary," dated May 10, said, "Leaks all stopped (or nearly). pontoons [sic] in and at 55enough water in trench to float dome. Turned once around. " As novel as the floating dome idea was, it would cause serious problems in Flagstaff's cold winter months. The water in the trench would freeze, undoubtedly damaging the pontoons and the trench itself. The pontoon idea had to be abandoned and the original iron wheels replaced.
The exact date of the pontoon removal is unknown, however they were certainly gone by # A photograph taken inside the dome in that year shows the LOWELL OBSERVATORY, CLARK DOME HABS NO. A2-206-B (page 10) original iron wheels back in place.56 Today, the only reminders of the short-lived pontoon system are the water stains on the 57 interior walls of the dome just below the site of the trench. Continuing Research By Lowell's health was restored and he was back at the Observatory searching for evidence of life on Mars. The Clark dome and its 24-inch telescope were in almost constant use. Lowell was joined in Flagstaff by several new assistants, who would distinguish themselves with the mastery of new observing techniques and their own subsequent discoveries. V, M.
Slipher's work with spectrography and spiral nebulae continues to have an impact on astronomical studies today.58 Carl Otto Laropland, an astronomer who joined the Lowell staff in made significant breakthroughs in planetary photography, a fledgling field at that time.59 Also important during this time was the initial search for a "trans-Neptunian planet," a planet beyond Neptune.
Lowell searched for this planet unsuccessfully up until his death in In Constance Lowell, Percival's widow, had her husband's % mausoleum erected next to the dome where he had done so much of his research.61 With few exceptions, the 24-inch telescope and its dome saw almost continuous use from the completion date in For a period of several months in the telescope was unused as the telescope lens was being refigured. Another short break in the ongoing use of the dome occurred in In that year, the iron wheels that the dome rotated on had to be replaced. Instead of iron wheels, the new wheels were rubber automobile tires. Purchased with money donated by V. M. Slipher, the tires came from the Ford Motor Company.
These tires, each with a shiny silver toned hubcap, are still in place in the dome today.62 As the staff of the Observatory grew and the workload increased, more specialized equipment was needed for specific studies and other telescopes and domes were erected at Lowell Observatory. In a dome for a new 40-inch telescope was built.63 In a telescope dome was built to house the A. Lawrence Lowell telescope, the 13-inch telescope that was instrumental in the discovery of Pluto.64 Interestingly, the "Pluto dome," as this small dome became known, was a miniature version of the Clark dome. According to V. M. Slipher, the staff opted to use the same style of dome as, "That works and it is much easier to duplicate it than to design and build something different . . .
." Furthermore, Slipher noted that # a similar design, will give something good for less LOWELL OBSERVATORY, CLARK DOME HABS NO. AZ-206-B (page 11) money than the hemispherical type." 65 With new telescopes at Lowell Observatory and the establishment of a "dark observing site at Anderson Mesa in the late use of the Clark 24-inch refractor slowed down considerably. However, in the with a renewed interest in our own solar system due to the cold war "space race," the Clark dome saw extensive use once again. The 24- inch refractor was enlisted in a moon mapping project conducted by the Aero Chart and Information66Center, a group affiliated with the United States Air Force. In the the use of the Clark dome and telescope has tapered off for research purposes.
However, it sees extensive use from the Observatory's evening visitors. It has not been retired from astronomical research and according to Robert Millis, Observatory Director, the optical quality of the telescope is still quite remarkable and the telescope may be called into service at any time.67 The Clark dome and telescope were nominated to the National Register of Historic Places in December and they are popular attractions with visitors to the Lowell Observatory. % Visitors see the Clark dome and 24-inch telescope in much their original form as only a few changes to the exterior have been made to accommodate visitor traffic. A concrete sidewalk with railings and footlights now passes around the west side of the dome.
A gabled portico was added in to the north door to protect the entrance from winter icicles. In addition, two of the panels in the north door were replaced with glass to allow visitors to see inside when the dome is closed.68