Historical Information A. Physical History: 1. Date of Erection: Construction on Research Hut No. 6 began in and was completed by the end of 1 2. Architect: None. According to his own claims and reports written decades after construction was completed, Superintendent Thomas Boles designed Research Hut No. 6; however, this statement is not backed up by any archival documents. In reviewing all of Boles diaries and superintendent reports submitted to the National Park Service, he made no mention of designing the buildings but left very detailed reports for all other projects he undertook. Documentation by the NPS written decades later lists him as the architect, but provide no evidence for this assertion.
Moreover, this claim is further suspect as these same documents, also state that the Civilian Conservation Corps built Research Hut No. 6 from which is impossible as President Franklin D. Roosevelt did not found the CCC as part of the New Deal until 2 Researchers did not find any archival documentation listing the individuals who did build the quarters. Given the repeated error of listing Boles as the designer and the CCC as the builders since the it is likely that identities of the cave guides who designed and built this research hut, later used as an employee quarter, for their own use were never recorded and thus 1 National Park Service, List of Classified Structures, 2 John C.
Paige, The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, An Administrative History, CARLSBAD CAVERNS NATIONAL PARK, RESEARCH HUT NO. 6 HABS No. NM-152-A (Page 3) credit was given posthumously to Boles and the 3. Original and Subsequent owners, occupants, uses: The National Park Service has owned, operated, and occupied Research Hut No. 6 since its construction. Originally, it served as employee quarter or research hut for cave guides. In more recent decades, it has been used for seasonal housing and visiting research housing and offices. 4. Builder, contractor, suppliers: No surviving records list specific contractors or suppliers.
Thomas Boles monthly Superintendent Reports and his diaries both state that the cave guides themselves rallied together to build this structure using primarily local materials. 5. Original plans and construction: Design drawings or plans have not been located, either in the official park management records or in the personal archive of Thomas Boles. Given the acute lack of housing and with the growing need for infrastructure to support the demands of tourism, it is likely that this structure was built rapidly without formal blueprints or plans.
Physical evidence of this vernacular construction remains in the building, including substantially angled and sloped exterior walls; variation in construction details, such as shelves of slightly varied length, doors and frames that are not precise rectangles; and nearly all interior walls lack 90 degree angles. While some of these features might be due to the age and natural settling processes of buildings over time, Research Hut No. 6 displays substantially more evidence of these features than other buildings within the park that were both designed and built by NPS architects and contractors. 6.
Alterations and Additions: Archival records do not list any alterations or additions until the late when some of the severely damaged vigas and lintels were replaced while the ones in better shape were repaired. 3 Throughout the years, the NPS has made small alterations, such as changes in plumbing fixtures, but these have not decreased the building s overall integrity and reflect its changing use over time. B. Historical Context: Carlsbad Caverns National Park lies within the Guadalupe Mountains, and was formed within large and unique geological formations. Although many knew of the caves for centuries, it was not until the that a steady stream of tourists and miners looking for guano began to popularize the cave beyond the region.
In the later years of the the demand for tours increased enough for locals to begin charging fees and developing infrastructure; originally, one could only access the cave via a guano mining bucket lowered into the natural entrance. Improving the accessibility of the cave meant that a far greater number of tourists could descend into the cave per day. 3 Goodall, Harrison. Preservation Plan: Wood Exterior Elements, prepared for Carlsbad Caverns National Park by Conservation Services. September 29, CARLSBAD CAVERNS NATIONAL PARK, RESEARCH HUT NO. 6 HABS No. NM-152-A (Page 4) While many claim to have been the first to discover the caves, most agree that local Jim White was the first to explore the caves beyond the main entrance within historic memory.
4 By White s tours attracted national attention. Later that year, Robert Holley an official from the Government Land Office paid a visit to determine its eligibility for a National Monument. He became so impressed with the handiwork of the Great Architect that he recommended it be made a National Monument as soon as possible.
5 The National Park Service was still in its infancy, as President Woodrow Wilson established it upon signing the Organic Act on August 25, On October 25, President Calvin Coolidge designated the caves as Carlsbad Cave National Monument: [The Carlsbad cavern has] extraordinary proportions and of unusual beauty and variety of natural decoration; and WHEREAS, beyond the spacious chambers that have been explored, other vast chambers of unknown character and dimensions exist; and WHEREAS, the several chambers contain stalactites, stalagmites, and other formations in such unusual number, size, beauty of form, and variety of figure as to make this a cavern equal, if not superior, in both scientific and popular interest to the better known caves; and WHEREAS, it appears that the public interest would be promoted by reserving this natural wonder as a National Monument, together with as much land as may be needed for the protection, not only of the known entrance, but such other entrances as may be found.
6 After this proclamation, journalists, photographers, and scientists traveled to New Mexico to see the wonders of the cave themselves. Their publications help promote the caverns as a site of natural and scientific wonder. The rapid influx of tourists quickly overwhelmed the paltry infrastructure, yet the designation of National Monument status did not bring the necessary funds to facilitate tourism or protect the resources. By NPS engineers and architects started surveying the park and identified several sites surrounding the natural entrance for construction. 7 The Caverns received their first full-time NPS employee two years after becoming a National Monument. Thomas Boles, the first official park Superintendent, worked there for over twenty years.
It was he who argued to Washington officials in that there was enough public excitement to develop "the Cave from a spectacular standpoint, rather than as a mere geological exhibit. 8 At this time, his staff lived in make-shift 4 See: Ruth Caiar and Jim White One Man's Dream: The Story of Jim White, Discoverer and Explorer of the Carlsbad Caverns, 5 Typescript, Robert A. Holley, Report on the Carlsbad Cave, 9. Box Entry 10 - Central Classified Files, Record Group 79 - Records of the National Park Service, National Archives and Records Administration II, College Park, MD [hereafter Entry 10, RG 79, NARA II]. As cited in Lisa Pfueller Davidson, Historic American Buildings Survey: Iceberg Rock Staircase, HABS No. 4.
6 Calvin Coolidge, Creation of Carlsbad Cavern National Monument, proclamation (1679-Oct. Stat. 7 Davidson, Iceberg Rock, 7. 8 Letter, Boles to A. E. Demaray, Assistant Director, (21 November Box Entry 10, RG 79, NARA II. As CARLSBAD CAVERNS NATIONAL PARK, RESEARCH HUT NO. 6 HABS No. NM-152-A (Page 5) structures and tents until they built permanent stone buildings in the late As one of the earliest National Monuments and with the scarcity of infrastructure prior to Research Hut No. 6 represents the larger ideals of the NPS to provide facilities with minimal damage to the natural features of the park. These design ideals, known as Rustic Design, or Parkitecture, allowed for structures that mirrored their surroundings in form, material, and color.
Closely associated with Parkitecture is the Pueblo Revival style in which Research Hut No. 6 and the other quarters were built in as well. The NPS removed all previous buildings that did not fit this blend of styles. The master plan for Carlsbad Caves began to take shape under the direction of Thomas Vint, the Chief of the NPS Landscape Engineering Division in Los Angeles, California. The existing archival records show that he designed the landscape surrounding the structures and the majority of the buildings. Decades later, however, Thomas Boles claimed that he himself had designed the employee quarters 6, 7, 8, and 9, despite the fact that none of his superintendent reports mention this.
An avid dairy writer, Boles does, however, make detailed and repeated entries of the construction process. Nevertheless, after he claimed this, nearly all park documents written afterwards accept his claim, though the National Register Nomination does highlight this discrepancy. Pueblo Revival style first emerged in California during the early as a blend of Native American Pueblo architecture and Spanish Colonial design and soon became popular in Arizona and New Mexico. E. P. Ripley, the president of the Atchinson, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company, advocated for the style to be used in hotels, stations, and other ancillary buildings along the railroad, which help spread and cement the popularity of the revival style.
9 Pueblo Rival style became widespread across New Mexico after George Tight, an architect and president of the University of New Mexico, decided to remodel some of the campus buildings in this style in followed by the construction of the Santa Fe Art Museum in the same style. After New Mexico achieved statehood in several artists, archeologists, and historians in Santa Fe worked to protect and bolster the region s architectural legacy, cementing the style later employed at Carlsbad Caverns. Typical features of the design included rounded corners, flat roofs, vigas, and earth-toned materials. Architectural critic Sylvanus Griswold Morley commented on the style in writing about the most important characteristics stated [t]he general effect is low and long. . . .
The buildings appear to cling to mother earth and do not rear themselves ineffectual competition with natural elevations. 10 While many buildings in this style are built of adobe or stuccoed to mimic adobe, Research Hut No. 6, is built of locally quarried limestone in the Pueblo Revival style. Stone, although less commonly found in this style, is more typical of the majority of the pueblos the style is meant to evoke. 11 Later buildings within the park were built in cited in Davidson, Iceberg Rock, 7. 9 Sylvanus Griswold Morley, Santa Fe Architecture, in Ralph Emerson Twitchell, ed.
Old Santa Fe: A Magazine of History, Archeology, Genealogy, and Biography (Santa Fe: Old Santa Fe Press, 10 Ibid., 11 National Register of Historic Places, The Caverns Historic District, Carlsbad Caverns National Park, Eddy CARLSBAD CAVERNS NATIONAL PARK, RESEARCH HUT NO. 6 HABS No. NM-152-A (Page 6) adobe following the Territorial Revival style. Research Hut No. 6, along with the other employee quarters built in the late set a precedence for the rest of the park s built environment. Their unique style also served to increase tourism, as tourists enjoyed them and often took souvenir photographs or bought postcards of them. After completion of the employee quarters, boles rightly boasted to Washington that these stone cabins fit in perfectly with the surroundings." 12