BlockBefore

San Rafael Bridge, Spanning San Rafael River near Buckhorn Wash, Castle Dale

San Rafael Bridge, Spanning San Rafael River near Buckhorn Wash, Castle Dale, Emery County, UT. Surveyed as HAER UTAH,8-CADA.V,1-, with a 2,847-word written history.

From the record

“The San Rafael Bridge is a single span double intersection Warren suspension bridge and is one of two known bridges of this type in Utah.”

Written record, HAER UTAH,8-CADA.V,1- survey. Machine-read text.

Surveyed by the federal HAER program as HAER UTAH,8-CADA.V,1- · the record runs 2847 words · one of 10 surveyed structures published for this county.

Sources: the survey record at the Library of Congress

Written history

2682 words

The headings the report itself prints. Each one jumps to where it begins.

Source document Quoted word for word from HAER UTAH,8-CADA.V,1-. Not written, edited or summarised by this site.

Don Southworth Office of Public Archaeology October San Rafael Bridge HAER No. UT-60 (Page 2) HISTORY A. The CCC and the Bridge In at the height of The Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt was elected president, with the hope that he might lead the nation out of the worst economic slump of its history. A month after assuming office, the new president issued Executive Order which established the Emergency Conservation Work Program. [1] [2] The Emergency Conservation program was later renamed the Civilian Conservation Corps The purpose of this program was to put to work an estimated twelve to sixteen million unemployed men.

[3] These men were to be employed on public projects located with state and federal lands, the projects would include transportation improvements, flood control, forestry, soil conservation, irrigation improvements, and recreational development. [4j Robert Fechner was appointed director of CCC in April and remained its head until his death in December [5] He had been a member of the General Executive Board of the International Association of Machinists and vice-president of the American Federation of Labor. [6] Fechner was succeeded by James M. McEntee as director in March [7] Four government departments were required to carry out the CCC program -- War, Labor, Agriculture and Interior.

The War Department was responsible for the care, feeding and personal supervision of the Corps, while the Labor Department enrolled the men through the individual state welfare agencies. The Agriculture and Interior departments were responsible for the technical administration and supervision of the Corps' projects. [8] [9] In a government report described the makeup of a typical CCC camp and those across the nation, as follows: Each CCC camp houses 160 enrollees. Camps also house army reserve officers, work supervisors, and technical personnel. In January there were CCC camps in operation; of which were under the technical supervision of the Department of the Interior.

Surveys conducted by the Department of Labor revealed that 75 percent of all young men entering the CCC during the past year were under the age of 21 when enrolled. Out of juniors selected in October 27 percent were 17 years old; 26 percent were 18; and 14 percent were 19 years old.

The survey also indicated that about a fifth of these junior 'enroHees' had never held a steady job until their enrollment in the From to these CCC enrollees completed projects which "included the planting of several million trees, the construction of miles of truck trails and minor roads, erection of miles of telephone lines, the building of bridges, and the construction of over large impounding and diversion dams." The original program limited enlistment "to unemployed single men between eighteen and twenty-five who were members of families on relief rolls." Enlistment quotas were based non population of the individual state, of which Utah's was set at The CCC added to this number, local, experienced men," to act as project leaders.

These leaders were "unemployed carpenters, lumbermen, miners, and others." From the first, the quotas were oversubscribed as the unemployed rushed to fill thee positions. By there were forty-five percent more citizens of Utah working on CCC projects than the national average. San Rafael Bridge HAER No. UT-60 (Page 3) in Utah, the CCC constructed twenty-six camps of which twenty were in national forests, one in Zion National Park and five on state land. After the first three months of working in the state, the CCC had constructed 12 fire breaks, 24 miles of road, 100 stone dams, 200 miles of surface ditches, planted 25 acres of trees and worked on 779 acres for erosion control.

From to they had constructed 709 bridges in Utah, of which 231 were foot and horse types, while the remaining 478 were vehicular bridges. The swing bridge across the San Rafael River in Buckhorn Wash was one of these vehicular bridges. In the eastern portion of Emery County was a relatively inaccessible region. Except for the rivers and streams that drain through the area on their way to the Colorado River, it was a dry and desolate country. The only people to enter this part of the county were cattle and sheep ranchers and a few oil prospectors. As the emphasis on transportation changed from the horse to the automobile, it became necessary for the region to be accessed by car. Three bridges had been constructed across the San Rafael River prior to the swing bridge.

Because each of these were pier bridges, their support substructures were constructed in the river bed. Later, flash floods would sweep through the dry washes and wash away the bridge support structure. The solution to this flash flooding problem was to construct a suspension-swing bridge type with its support structure located on the river banks. These bridges were important to the local inhabitants of the area. The sixty-eight ranchers, who lived and worked the range, needed the bridge to get their herds across the river for grazing purposes. Prior to the construction of the swing bridge, a small trolley system was the only means of crossing the river when their was too much water to wade across.

The Grazing Administration saw the need for a swing bridge and authorized construction of the San Rafael Bridge. B. Construction Chronology In May 23, the construction of the bridge was announced to the public in the following newspaper article: At last the spike camp on Buckhorn Trail is completed. Twenty-nine enrollees, under the supervision of Allen Lowry, are progressing rapidly on the building of the road and have started operations on the suspension bridge that will span the San Rafael River. This bridge is expected to be completed by the first of July. The road is passable for motor travel up to the San Rafael River.

The week after the above announcement appeared in the local newspapers, a more in-depth article discussed the need for the bridge and road, as well as describing its construction: The new bridge, upon which work has already started, will be swung on two cables, each two and one-half inches in diameter and more than 250 feet long. Four concrete towers, two on each bank of the San Rafael, will support the cables, which will have their end fastened securely in the solid ground 50 feet from the edge of the stream. The distance between towers will be 160 feet. The bridge will be 14 feet and will permit the passing of two automobiles. The floor will be of heavy planking. The bridge was designed by Mr. Lehmer, aided by W. P. Henock, engineer San Rafael Bridge HAER No.

UT-60 (Page 4) -draftsman for the ECW. Actual construction will be in charge of M. P. Greaves, superintendent of DG camp 27 at Castle Dale, and K. D. Williams and Omer Freeman, grazing division engineers. A few months later, the Emery County Express reported that work was progressing despite a problem the CCC workers had in getting materials to the site due to bad roads. The road was still under construction by other enrollees and was not due to be completed for another two years. The article went on to say: The actual construction work on this project is being done by Mr.

Pearce of Spanish Fork, bridge contractor; Allen Lowry of Castle Dale, foreman in charge of the enrolled men working on the project and the forty-man side camp located in Buckhorn Wash; and Alvin Jensen of Castle Dale, mechanic in charge of the machinery used on the project. Unlike most government agencies, the CCC was an organization which used every available resource to complete its assigned tasks. The San Rafael Bridge project was no exception. Other CCC crews contributed to the construction of the road and bridge by supplying materials for its construction. Another newspaper article of the time illustrates this point as follows: David Tuttle has again resumed work in the Manti forest. The project calls for board feet of lumber.

The logging crew has felled timber and hauled about board feet of lumber this year. This lumber was used for the building of culverts and bridges on the Buckhorn road, for planking on the suspension bridge over the San Rafael River and for the use of buildings at the spike camps. The logging crew consists of 15 men and is under the supervision of Foreman David Tuttle of Orangeville. By February the bridge portion of the project was complete. The Emery County Progress summed up the project as follows: The most outstanding accomplishment in the work program of the Department of Grazing by Co. 529 is the suspension bridge that spans the San Rafael River, 26 miles east of Castle Dale, on the Buckhorn Trail. This bridge required 250 man days to complete.

The bridge has a 160 foot span from center to pier and is 14 ft. wide with four reinforced concrete piers 16 ft. high, with two steel suspension cables inches in diameter that fasten to four solid concrete anchors sunken deep in the ground on either side. The bridge has a 16 foot wide, 1/4 mile approach from both sides. All the timber used in the construction of this suspension bridge was cut and hauled from the Manti forest by enrollee hand labor. The only work not done on this bridge by enrollees was done by one experienced bridge carpenter. In recent years bridges have been built across the ever shifting river with its quick sand beds, but the elements have torn them out.

But this creation of the CCC labor is expected to break the spirit of the elements with its sturdy structure and open the vast grazing range to the stockmen in the future. On April between to people attended the dedication of the bridge in Buckhorn Wash. In attendance were federal and state officials, Salt Lake City civic groups, CCC officials, as well as Governor Henry H, Flood and Samuel O. Bennion, representing the LDS Church. the high school band played 'America,' followed by speeches with the main address coming from the governor. Following the speeches, a ribbon was cut and the bridge was officially opened to the public. San Rafael Bridge HAER No. UT-60 (Page 5) II. THE

Bridge a

Description The bridge across the San Rafael River at the mouth of Buckhorn Wash is a single span double intersection warren suspension structure constructed of wood timbers held with steel vertical rods and suspended from concrete pylons by steel cables. The wood truss members consist of thirteen panels of double intersection Warren truss diagonal bracing with inclined end posts. The upper and lower chords are wood timbers that measure 8 inches square and 19 feet long, while the diagonal Warren members are 6-inch square timbers. The vertical rods each measure 6 feet high and the bridge measures 8 feet 2 inches high from the deck to the top of the upper chord. Total length of the bridge is 160 feet and the width is 12 feet 6 inches.

The wood stringers which support the deck are 1 foot by 4 inches and the deck planks measure 1 foot by 2 inches. These stringers and planks arc supported by steel T beams with wood timber lateral bracing. The entire truss system is held up by two steel cables that run parallel to the trusses from two 16 foot concrete pylons that taper from a 6-foot square base to a 2 foot square top. The cables are approximately 1 inch in diameter and consist of six twisted bundles of wire strands. Each cable end is attached to a large "U" bolt which is passed through a large eye bolt. The eye bolt is anchored into a triangular concrete pad, which is 15 feet 6 inches long and 8 feet wide.

The cable is attached to the bridge by steel rods, which are progressively shorter as the cable dips to the middle of the truss. The concrete pylons are part of the cement abutments located on each end of the bridge, the south abutment is solid concrete, while the north abutment has stone masonry beneath the cement surface and between the bases of the pylons. The bridge truss system swings freely from the cables and is not attached to the abutments in any way. A steel expansion plate lies across the gap between the abutment and the trusses. A railing of 2 inch by 6 inch boards runs the full length of the structure. This railing consists of two rails. The top of the upper rail is 3 feet 6 inches above the deck. The top of the lower rail is 2 feet 3 inches from the deck.

A tire guard also runs the full length of the bridge. It consists of a 4 inch by 6 inch beam which is 4 inches above the deck surface. B. Modification The San Rafael Bridge has undergone only minor alterations over the years since its construction in The deck and stringers have deteriorated from the effects of weathering and the weight of vehicular traffic. The substructure shows signs of this wear and replacement. Several older stringers are broken off at the ends and some appear to have been replaced. The deck appears newer and contains new bolts where the runners are fastened to the deck. C. Ownership and Future The San Rafael Swing Bridge is presently owned and maintained by Emery County. Plans call for the abandonment of the bridge in situ, due to structural decay.

Another bridge will be constructed down stream to replace the Swing Bridge and Emery County will continue to perform maintenance on the original bridge. San Rafael Bridge HAER No. UT-60 (Page 6) IV. FOOTNOTES [1] Hardy, Brian Clyde, The Historical Development of Wasatch Trails in Salt Lake County. p. [2] Baldridge, Kenneth W., "Reclamation Work of the Civilian Conservation Corps p. [3] Ibid., p. [4] Pinkett, Harold T., "Records of Historic Thrust for Conservation," p. 80. [5] The Historical Development of Wasatch Trails in Salt Lake County, p. [6] Ibid., p. [7] "Reclamation Work of the Civilian Conservation Corps p. [8] Ibid., p. [9] Johnson, Charles W., "The Army and the Civilian Conservation Corps, p. Malrngren, Larry R, A History of the WPA in Utah, p. 15.

Ibid [Ill -> P- 16- "Reclamation Works of the Civilian Conservation Corps p. Ibid., p. A History of the WPA in Utah, p. "Reclamation Works of the Civilian Conservation Corps p. Ibid., p. Baldridge, Kenneth W., Nine Years of Achievement: The Civilian Conservation Corps in Utah, p. Emery County Progress, May 29, Ibid., May 29, Ibid., May Ibid., June 19, Ibid., May 22, San Rafael Bridge HAER No. UT-60 (Page 7) Ibid., May 29, Ibid., June 5, Ibid., October 16, Ibid., February Ibid., April 30, V. BIBLIOGRAPHY A.

Books Baldridge, Kenneth W., Nine Years of Achievement: The Civilian Conservation Corps in Utah, Provo, Utah; Dissertation, Brigham Young University, Emery County, Emery County: Emery County Historical Society; Hardy, Brian Clyde, The Historical Development of Wasatch Trail in Salt Lake County. Provo, Utah; Master's Thesis, Brigham Young University, Malmgren, Larry H., A History of the WPA in Utah. Logan, Utah; Master's Thesis, Utah State University, B. Periodicals Baldridge, Kenneth W., "Reclamation Work of the Civilian Conservation Corps Utah Historical Quarterly, Summer Vol. 39, No. 3. Johnson, Charles W., "The Army and the Civilian Conservation Corps, Prologue, The Journal of the National Archives, Fall Pinkett, Harold T., "Records of Historic Thrust for Conservation," Prologue.

The Journal of the National Archives, Summer Vol. 8, No. 2. C. Newspapers 1. History a. Construction Chronology Emery County Progress, May 22, , May 29, , June , June 19, , October , February 12, _, April 30, San Rafael Bridge I-IAER No. UT-60 (page 8) San Rafael Bridge Office of Public Archaeology HAER No. UT-60 Brigham Young University South Approach Provo, Utah 13 Dec San Rafael Bridge ILAER NO. UT-60 (pa^o 9 ) 10 ft Office of Public Archaeology San Rafael Bridge Brigham Young University HAER No. UT-60 Provo, Utah Cross-section 13 Dec HAER No. UT-60 Page 10 V _J4 Xh m . ,f. 1 i- Ml - "3 > y \ / \

In context

Castle Dale, Utah The place record: every map, photograph and survey of this town.
Emery County, Utah 88 topographic sheets across the county.
Library of Congress record The original filed report as the survey filed it.

Also surveyed in Emery County

9 records

The federal survey recorded these other structures elsewhere in Emery County. These are the other structures they measured and filed a report on, longest report first.

SheetStructure SurveyReport
Lower San Rafael River BridgeHAER UTAH,8-GREER.V,1-3,099 words
Mounds BridgeHAER UTAH,8-ELMO.V,1-2,489 words
Huntington Creek BridgeHAER UTAH,8-HUNT.V,1-1,895 words
Emery Latter-Day Saints ChurchHABS UTAH,8-EMERY,1-1,215 words
Copper Globe MineHAER UT-97536 words
Copper Globe MineHAER UT-97-B357 words
Copper Globe MineHAER UT-97-A345 words
Copper Globe MineHAER UT-97-C310 words
Irrigation Water WheelHAER UTAH,10-GRENRI,1-38 words

Provenance

  • Written history. Quoted verbatim from HAER UTAH,8-CADA.V,1-. United States federal work, no copyright under 17 U.S.C. 105.
  • Text capture. Machine-read from the scanned typescript filed with the survey, so spelling and spacing follow the original page.
  • How this page is made. Documentary passages are quoted from the linked federal record; page labels and counts are clearly marked as site presentation or calculations.