BlockBefore

Deer Creek Dam, Salt Lake Aqueduct Intake Control Gate, 94 feet/94 degrees from Hydroelectric Powerplant (HAER UT-93-B), Charleston

Deer Creek Dam, Salt Lake Aqueduct Intake Control Gate, 94 feet/94 degrees from Hydroelectric Powerplant (HAER UT-93-B), Charleston, Wasatch County, UT. Surveyed as HAER UT-93-E, with a 831-word written history.

From the record

“Constructed between and the Deer Creek Darn was constructed as the key structure of the Bureau of Reclamation's Provo River Project, the largest water resource development project undertaken in Utah.”

Written record, HAER UT-93-E survey. Machine-read text.

Surveyed by the federal HAER program as HAER UT-93-E · the record runs 831 words · one of 48 surveyed structures published for this county.

Sources: the survey record at the Library of Congress

Present Use

65 words

Source document Quoted word for word from HAER UT-93-E. Not written, edited or summarised by this site.

The Deer Creek Darn continues as a key feature of the Provo River Project to maintain a supplemental water supply for agricultural and domestic use in Wasatch, Utah, and Salt Lake Counties. The Deer Creek Reservoir formed by the darn feeds the 42-rnile-long Salt Lake Aqueduct and its Terminal Reservoir. The hydroelectric powerplant at the darn generates as much as kilowatts that is locally distributed.

Significance

233 words

Source document Quoted word for word from HAER UT-93-E. Not written, edited or summarised by this site.

Constructed between and the Deer Creek Darn was constructed as the key structure of the Bureau of Reclamation's Provo River Project, the largest water resource development project undertaken in Utah. It was the second largest earth fill darn constructed by Reclamation at the time, and Reclamation's first project intended to provide domestic water. The Provo River Project followed a precedent of 40 Federal reclamation projects that had been or were nearly completed by Its construction was during a significant period of accelerated American infrastructure development founded on technological investment intended to make the West a sustainable, viable, and profitable landscape.

For additional information regarding the construction of the Deer Creek Darn, refer to "Deer Creek Darn CCC Government Camp," HABS No. UT-137. Deer Creek Dam, Salt Lake Aqueduct Intake Control Gate HAER No. UT-93-E (page 2) Project Statement: This HAER project was undertaken by the Utah Department of Transportation in order to document the historic features of the dam prior to the realignment and improvement of U. S. Highway 189 in the area. Preparation for construction of the Deer Creek portion has been underway since the and the work is expected to begin in The field work, site plan, historical reports, and photographs were prepared by Alpine Archaeological Consultants, Inc., Montrose, Colorado. Jonathon C.

Horn served as the Principal Investigator, and Gianfranco Archimede conducted the fieldwork, historic research, large-format photography, and report preparation.

Written history

433 words

Source document Quoted word for word from HAER UT-93-E. Not written, edited or summarised by this site.

Gianfranco Archimede, Alpine Archaeological Consultants, Inc., April Deer Creek Dam, Salt Lake Aqueduct Intake Control Gate HAER No. UT-93-E (page 3) Although Deer Creek Dam was constructed between and modifications and additions were made to the dam after its completion. The Salt Lake Aqueduct was completed in 12 years after its construction began. The intake for the aqueduct was through the control gate on the west side of the Deer Creek Powerplant tailrace (HAER No. UT-93-D). The intake gate was installed in with the completion of the Salt Lake Aqueduct. It functioned to regulate water flow through the aqueduct between its origin at the base of the Deer Creek Dam and its terminus at the Terminal Reservoir in Salt Lake City.

The fixed-wheel gate was operated by an electric winch to pull a cable attached to the gate. The winch was mounted to a vertical steel framework situated directly above the gate at the top edge of the tailrace riprap. The winch framework was anchored into a 15 by 18-foot poured concrete floor that was likely covered by a structure (no structure exists today). A 5-foot-wide poured concrete chute slopes downward across the tailrace riprap from the winch area to the submerged gate. A 4-inch-wide iron channel imbedded in the center of the concrete chute carried the cable between the winch and the gate. A steel stairway running along the south side of the concrete chute provided access to the intake gate.

The dimensions and character of the gate itself are unknown, as it is submerged in the tailrace. The gate was automatically controlled by a flow meter mechanism in the venturi structure which had a rate- setting device inside of the recording cabinet. The device was set manually to the desired flow in the aqueduct, and, through a system of electrical relays, the gate hoist motor opened or closed the gate to adjust the water flow for the desired setting. The gate hoist motor could also be operated manually by push buttons to open, close, or stop the gate. 1 The intake gate was replaced by a more sophisticated gate control system, situated on the west side of the tailrace and south of the original control gate. Although the original gate itself was left in place, it is no longer used.

See photographs and indices for HAER Nos. UT-93-15, 18, and UT-93- B-1 for views of the intake control gate. 1 U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Final Construction Report: Salt Lake Aqueduct, Provo River Project, Utah, submitted by L. R. Dunkley, Project Engineer (Provo, UT: Bureau of Reclamation), p.

In context

Charleston, Utah The place record: every map, photograph and survey of this town.
Wasatch County, Utah 88 topographic sheets across the county.
Library of Congress record The original filed report as the survey filed it.

Also surveyed in Charleston

21 records

The federal surveyors worked through Charleston building by building. These are the other structures they measured and filed a report on, longest report first.

SheetStructure SurveyReport
Deer Creek DamHAER UT-936,760 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-1371,736 words
Deer Creek DamHAER UT-93-A1,734 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-B1,010 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-A1,002 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-C967 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-L870 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-J841 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-M833 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-K811 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-F790 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-G757 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-E735 words
Deer Creek DamHAER UT-93-F725 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-D664 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-H662 words
Deer Creek DamHABS UT-137-I659 words
Deer Creek DamHAER UT-93-B632 words
Deer Creek DamHAER UT-93-D618 words
Deer Creek DamHAER UT-93-G488 words
Deer Creek DamHAER UT-93-C478 words

Provenance

  • Written history. Quoted verbatim from HAER UT-93-E. United States federal work, no copyright under 17 U.S.C. 105.
  • Text capture. Machine-read from the scanned typescript filed with the survey, so spelling and spacing follow the original page.
  • How this page is made. Documentary passages are quoted from the linked federal record; page labels and counts are clearly marked as site presentation or calculations.